<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sebastyne&#039;s Extended Profile ;) &#187; psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sebastyne.com/tag/psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sebastyne.com</link>
	<description>Basically... Twitter profile drives me nuts. This is to replace it. XD (Rather an over reaction don&#039;t you think?!)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A blog comment is not always a compliment</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.com/blogging/a-blog-comment-is-not-always-a-compliment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebastyne.com/blogging/a-blog-comment-is-not-always-a-compliment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sebastyn Sebby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=1109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most bloggers are hoping to receive comments to their posts. That is pretty much the reason they keep posting. If there isn&#8217;t any posts to their topics, they think nobody cares what they said and very likely stop. It&#8217;s still tolerable if you can tell nobody knows about your blog, but when you see in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most bloggers are hoping to receive comments to their posts. That is pretty much the reason they keep posting. If there isn&#8217;t any posts to their topics, they think nobody cares what they said and very likely stop. It&#8217;s still tolerable if you can tell nobody knows about your blog, but when you see in your stats that people read it but  nobody says anything, it can really drive you on the walls. I certainly don&#8217;t post as much as I would if there was comments on my posts, even though I have come to think the following:</p>
<p><strong>The reasons I post a comment:</strong></p>
<p>1) I read a blog post that is a fairly good one, but could be better. I have something to add or point out.</p>
<p>2) What the blogger said was so god damned idiotic, that I just have to tell them how things REALLY are.</p>
<p><strong>Then there&#8217;s two reasons for not commenting:</strong></p>
<p>1) The post was so pointless that it would be waste of my time to say anything.</p>
<p>2) The post was SO GOOD, that it would be pointless to say anything, because the only thing to add would be: &#8220;Hey, great post&#8221; and that reeks of someone after your Google Juice.</p>
<p>Now, the thing for you to do is to decide whether your posts are god damned pointless or simply amazing, and figure out which is the more likely reason for the lack of comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebastyne.com/blogging/a-blog-comment-is-not-always-a-compliment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter is bad for your ego</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.com/social-networking/twitter-is-bad-for-your-ego/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sebastyne.com/social-networking/twitter-is-bad-for-your-ego/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 02:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sebastyn Sebby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is of general knowledge that Twitter is hard to understand. Why is it so hyped, when there&#8217;s so little to do? On Twitter, there is two things you can do to make it valuable for you: Be interested or be interesting. If you can&#8217;t be neither, there&#8217;s nothing left for you on Twitter. You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://sebastyne.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/postimage-twitter-bad-ego.jpg" alt="postimage-twitter-bad-ego" title="postimage-twitter-bad-ego" width="200" height="150" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1009" />It is of general knowledge that Twitter is hard to understand. Why is it so hyped, when there&#8217;s so little to do? On Twitter, there is two things you can do to make it valuable for you: <strong><em>Be interested or be interesting</em></strong>. If you can&#8217;t be neither, there&#8217;s nothing left for you on Twitter. You can&#8217;t go on polishing your profile endlessly, nobody looks at it more than once anyway. You can&#8217;t spend your time taking tests of what type of a flower you are or which movie you should see next. You can&#8217;t spend your time posting links to your friends who will comment and &#8220;like&#8221; them out of responsibility toward you. On Twitter, you have to get to the point and get it there fast or you&#8217;ll sink into the oblivion in no time. Frankly, even if you do get to the point fast, you still sink into oblivion quite fast, and that is bad for your ego. That&#8217;s why you have to be interested in what others are saying too, in order to &#8220;get&#8221; twitter. And you have to know what interests you, and what type of people interest you, or you will randomly follow people who really are not interesting to you. Would I be so bold as to suggest that Twitter is a tool for smart people with a healthy ego..? (Not counting celebs and companies into that though.)</p>
<p>What people with a fragile ego will do to attempt to fool themselves into believing that they are interesting, is to follow a lot of people hoping to get a follow-back, especially those that use auto-follow tools if they spot one, and seek ways to &#8220;get thousands of followers automatically.&#8221; I doubt very much that those functions have much to do with practicality, but a lot to do with ego stroking. (I&#8217;m sure they explain it to themselves that they are doing it for business.) They are for people who don&#8217;t think their tweets will get them far enough fast enough for their own liking.</p>
<p>It is also quite an ego-bashing idea to believe that people would <em>actually</em> be interested in what you are doing right now. It won&#8217;t take you long to realize that NOBODY gives a damn about what you had for breakfast (unless you are a celebrity) and you will decide that you &#8220;don&#8217;t get&#8221; Twitter. Some people might have decided before trying it out that they don&#8217;t get Twitter, because who in their right mind would be interested in the daily activities of millions of nobodies around the world?</p>
<p>Twitter needs to be redefined so that people actually know what to expect of it. To me it&#8217;s a tool to broadcast 5 types of messages:<em> Headlines, questions, one-liners, aphorisms and celebrity updates.</em> Everything else is pretty pointless to put on Twitter. I admit I may have <a href="http://www.sebastyne.com/social-networking/facebook/facebook/">missed</a> a type or two, if you can think of something else that is useful on Twitter, please do mention them in the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sebastyne.com/social-networking/twitter-is-bad-for-your-ego/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

